All Zucked Up!

First, let’s dispense with the legalistic equivocating

The claim that this is a data breach is completely false…no systems were infiltrated, and no passwords or sensitive pieces of information were stolen or hacked.

Yup, that little gem was extracted straight from Facebook’s news page on March 17th.

I beg to differ with the technocratic brain trust hunkered down in Menlo Park – splitting hairs over the definition of “breach” was a complete waste of time. However, I do like Merriam-Webster’s definition, particularly the first usage example, “a breach of trust”, because it sums up the situation perfectly.

C’mon, you do know Facebook has consistently exhibited a complete and utter disdain for the so-called “dumb f*cks”, (Mr. Zuckerberg’s words, not mine), who have chosen to surrender their digital lives to his stupid company, right?

As reported in the Guardian on Saturday, the Observer disclosed what whistleblower, Christopher Wylie, described as a concerted effort to harvest millions of Facebook profiles and then build psycho-graphic models of those people targeting what Wylie referred to as “…their inner demons.”

In the past several days, we’ve seen undercover footage of Alexander Nix, the now-suspended CEO of Cambridge Analytica, bragging about the absurd amount of influence his company had with the Trump campaign, claiming:

“We did all the research, all the data, all the analytics, all the targeting. We ran all the digital campaign, the television campaign and our data informed all the strategy.”

Sure, this sociopath from England can’t speak proper English, but setting that aside, the implications of what he was caught on camera/tape saying are chilling, to say the least.

OK, so let’s recap: heartless technologists – 1, crusading politicians – 0… :-(

Sticking with what’s being reported by the Guardian, let’s now turn to the Chief-Executive-Apologizer’s™ tardy, non-committal, half-baked attempt at accepting responsibility for the entire company being asleep at the wheel:

“I’m really sorry that this happened.”

Yeah, definitely fell on his sword with that one, huh? Oh, did I mention he apologized for the “breach of trust”? Yeah, said that too… So Facebook attorneys, security geeks and public relations ‘droids chafe at the use of “breach”, but a handful of days later, ole’ Marky-Mark says he’s sorry for said breach [of trust]. And according to the same Guardian article:

Facebook’s chief operating officer, Sheryl Sandberg, shared Zuckerberg’s post and added her own comment: “We know that this was a major violation of people’s trust, and I deeply regret that we didn’t do enough to deal with it.”

Oooh, impressive – way to lean in Sheryl, way to lean in…

E.J. Dionne Jr., Washington Post, (paywall), opinion writer, thinks we should be outraged about the Facebook/Cambridge Analytica scandal, noting:

Zuckerberg’s statement Wednesday afternoon acknowledging “mistakes” and pledging to “work through this” largely repeated what we already know. He’ll have to do much more.

Agreed. Much more… Much, much more…

I’ll leave you with what New York Times, (paywall), technology writer, Nellie Bowles, quoted in a story about a former colleague of mine who, on Wednesday, suggested it might be time to #deletefacebook:

Employees may feel the freedom to rebel because of Silicon Valley’s success, both technologically and financially. The technology platforms have become more powerful — and the fortunes much bigger — than the programmers ever expected. So while the industry’s power disturbs them, the wealth allows them to speak out without fear of retribution…

True, but let’s not overlook the simple fact these rather public displays of righteous indignation are invariably launched after the check clears! Said differently, while you’re shoveling billions into your pockets, you’ll put up with just about anything…

I stand with McCabe…

The Washington Post, (paywall), laid out the basics of Jeff Sessions’ firing of Andrew McCabe, an act one can only describe as petty and vengeful:

Some in the bureau might view McCabe’s termination so close to retirement as an unnecessarily harsh and politically influenced punishment for a man who spent more than 20 years at the FBI.

Uh, yeah. Beyond harsh, it’s certainly infantile and most assuredly another sign of how morally compromised this administration really is. Let the howls of indignation begin…

A day later, the Washington Post, (paywall), opined on how this might come back and bite the Thief-in-Chief™ squarely in the ass, saying:

And it was made abundantly clear Friday night that McCabe is incensed by the decision. He released a lengthy statement deriding his firing as “slander” and arguing that the inspector general’s report was accelerated in response to his closed-door testimony saying he would corroborate key claims made by Comey. He suggested that the whole thing was part of a campaign to undermine the investigations involving Trump.

On Monday, the New York Times, (paywall), published an explainer on the McCabe situation – definitely worth a read!

…and because I haven’t issued a poster in a while, enjoy!

A .PDF version of today’s poster available here.

…this won’t hurt, not one bit!

WTF is going on over at the Securities and Exchange Commission?!

No admission of guilt?!
Surrender 18.9M shares, (and voting control), of utterly worthless stock?!
Can’t serve as an officer or director of a public company for a decade?!
A laughably affordable $500,000 fine?!

Elizabeth Holmes, self-styled acolyte of Steve Jobs, (yes, of course I’m referring to the late technologist, also fond of stretching the truth), will not – I repeat not – be severely punished by the SEC – nope, not even a slap on the wrist – it’s more like a lousy pin prick… Sorry, I couldn’t resist. :-(

Let’s hope the Department of Justice aggressively pursues a criminal case against this public menace, (quote sourced from MarketWatch on Thursday):

Michael Rivera, an attorney with Shiff Hardin who served as chief investigative counsel for the Office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, said, “It is not surprising, as has been reported, that Holmes remains subject to a criminal investigation by the Department of Justice. Based on the allegations in the SEC complaint — and they are just allegations since there was no admission of guilt — this case presents the type of securities violations the Department of Justice might be interested in pursuing. The fact that the alleged fraud was not just financial but also presented a potential a harm to public safety is a further factor that could motivate DOJ to investigate.”

Let’s hope.

I stumbled across one of Maya Kosoff’s articles from the Vanity Fair website Thursday evening and thought it was worth adding to my post. Apparently the boys on Sand Hill Road are doing a little soul-searching after watching was has been described as a “…slow-motion car crash…”, a.k.a. the rise and fall of Theranos. Sure, venture capital firms were snookered, as were a whole host of other people, but the fact remains the charlatan primarily responsible for this disaster needs to be held accountable – and I do mean fully accountable – for her fraudulent behavior. Handing over what amounts to little more than confederate script, being sidelined for a while and writing a check doesn’t even come close!

One of the chagrined interviewed by Kosoff is quoted as saying:

“If what she’s been charged with is true, she’s a criminal who should be in prison.”

True ‘dat.

Lock her up! Lock her up! Lock her up! Lock her up! Lock her up! Lock her up!

Tillerson goin’ bye, bye…

Aw, shucks, guess Sexie Rexie got the boot! ;-)

The New York Times reports Rex W. Tillerson’s employment as Secretary of State was abruptly terminated on Tuesday (paywall). Yeah, and the Thief-in-Chief™ did it in such a classy way too – again, from the Times:

Mr. Tillerson learned he had been fired on Tuesday morning when a top aide showed him a tweet…

The Washington Post headline reads “Trump Ousts Tillerson” (paywall), going on to confirm:

Steve Goldstein, undersecretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs, said that Tillerson was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump.

…and was promptly terminated for having told the truth instead of lying to the public! According to the Post:

…a top State Department spokesman [Goldstein] offered a different version of events — and was swiftly fired for contradicting the White House.

The Post goes on to say Mike Pompeo, Director of the CIA, is Trump’s choice as Tillerson’s replacement. So I guess the primary qualifier for pretty much any senior position in the White House is “likeability”… Again, from the Washington Post:

Pompeo long has been mentioned as Tillerson’s most likely replacement. As CIA director, the former Republican lawmaker from Kansas developed a warm relationship with Trump, often delivering the President’s Daily Brief to Trump in person and racing over to the West Wing at a moment’s notice to field the president’s queries on a range of topics.

Wow, Pompeo sounds like a boot-licking sycophant! Sad. The so-called “adult quotient” in the White House continues to decline – who’s next?