Full [Frontal] Disclosure

The Guardian reports (looming paywall) the Liar-in-Chief™ was compelled to admit in a mandatory disclosure statement filed with the Office of Government Ethics earlier this week reimbursing his attorney/fixer for hush money paid to an adult film actress back in 2016.

Ethics experts had been watching closely for the document to see if Trump would confirm that he paid Cohen back for the lawyer’s outlay – concerned that if the president did not he would be in breach of ethics laws.

Trump confirmed – bigly. With respect to ethics, the man has none…

The New York times (paywall) ponders whether or not ole’ Lyin’ Donny™ might’ve run afoul of ethics laws:

President Trump’s financial disclosure, released on Wednesday, included for the first time repayment of more than $100,000 to his personal lawyer, Michael D. Cohen, in 2017, raising questions about whether Mr. Trump’s sworn filing from a year ago improperly omitted the debt.

In a highly unusual letter, the Office of Government Ethics alerted the Justice Department on Wednesday to the omission, telling Rod J. Rosenstein, the deputy attorney general, that the ethics office had determined “the payment made by Mr. Cohen is required to be reported as a liability.”

Unusual. Highly unusual. Of course it’s unusual – we’re dealing with the most morally bankrupt person to ever occupy the White House!

…and then we have the New Yorker’s (paywall) take on the odd disappearance of suspicious activity reports, prompting a law enforcement official to surreptitiously disclose the existence of these reports before they vanished into thin air – OMG!

The official who released the suspicious-activity reports was aware of the risks, but said fears that the missing reports might be suppressed compelled the disclosure. “We’ve accepted this as normal, and this is not normal,” the official said. “Things that stand out as abnormal, like documents being removed from a system, are of grave concern to me.”

Of the potential for legal consequences, the official said, “To say that I am terrified right now would be an understatement.” But, referring to the released report, as well as the potential contents of the missing reports, the official also added, “This is a terrifying time to be an American, to be in this situation, and to watch all of this unfold.”

There you have it folks. A law enforcement official explicitly stating they are terrified – yes, terrified – of their counterparts’ motivations in other agencies.

Lastly, the Washington Post (paywall) opinion piece by Paul Waldman sums up the dire situation we find ourselves facing:

It starts with the fact that a hostile foreign government mounted a comprehensive effort to swing the results of an American election. Then there are Trump’s efforts to obstruct justice, for which there is ample evidence. Given what we know and what we’re learning literally on a daily basis, nobody sincerely thinks that Manafort and Cohen aren’t going to wind up behind bars.

Let’s hope. In fact, let’s hope every single person indicted as a result of Robert S. Mueller’s investigation ends up rotting in jail for a very, very long time…

…the president may be the single most corrupt prominent business figure in the United States

The fact I can extract the above from an article in the Washington Post as a direct quote from a respected journalist is chilling, to say the least.

Besties…

WTF?! …a single verb followed by a single adjective. That’s it?! The sum total of the eagerly anticipated “unveiling” of Melania Trump’s so-called ‘children’s agenda’, as reported by the New York Times (paywall) on Monday, May 7th?!

Hmmm… You have to wonder about the seemingly-random laundry list of “causes” too – combating opioid abuse, cyberbullying and obsessing over the mental health of America’s youth – I’d say all three of those hit pretty close to home there at ole’ 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, wouldn’t you?

…then there’s the issue of plagiarism raised by the Guardian (looming paywall).

OK, so maybe I’m a little cynical, but how on earth did the [completely undeserving] recipient of an EB-1 visa manage to, once again, crib original work inspired by Michelle Obama and think she’d get away with it? Clearly, this is no Einstein…

Incredibly lazy, yes. Incredibly brilliant, no.

I doubt the Plagiarizer-in-Chief™ has had an original thought since grade school in Slovenia. I’m thinking it might be time to go back and re-evaluate that 2001 EB-1 visa application. Heck, once you’ve got proof of falsification of qualifications, can’t you just deport the offending party? You know, send ’em right back to their sh*thole country?

Quell the rage, dear reader, quell the rage… I’m merely repeating the same phrase her xenophobic husband used while denigrating immigrants back in January!

Donny Does Dallas

One week ago today, The Washington Post (paywall) announced the Liar-in-Chief™ has eclipsed the 3,000 mark, and it had taken a mere 466 days to do it!

Lyin’ Donny was up to his old tricks in Dallas last Friday too… London? Knives?

…and, apparently, pathological lying is contagious. I think the daily White House press briefing should be re-branded as Kabuki though. I mean, c’mon, we’ve got stylized drama, elaborate makeup – all the ingredients are there!

How many lies did it take to separate other people’s money from the suckers who were dumb – or desperate – enough to lend it to the Liar-in-Chief™?

A .PDF version of each poster is available here and here.

Tears For Fears

On April 15th, the Editorial Board of the New York Times (paywall) penned an opinion piece titled The President is Not Above The Law, printed beneath a sobering black and white illustration of a shattered American flag ringed by the ghostly silhouettes of members of Congress…

It took me about a minute to read the article in its entirety, and then I sat there in the dark, (it was 3:30 AM where I was), weeping silently, the tears distorting that terrible image into something even more terrifying. Weep with me fellow Americans, weep with me…

The Editorial Board correctly asserts [referencing any future attempt to shut down the Mueller investigation]:

If Mr. Trump takes such drastic action, he will be striking at the foundation of the American government, attempting to set a precedent that a president, alone among American citizens, is above the law.

This cannot be allowed to happen. Congress must take steps to ensure the Mueller investigation be allowed to run its course. I speak for millions when I say, “No, sir, you are most assuredly not above the law.” The article continues:

The overwhelming majority of Americans, including most Republicans, want Mr. Mueller to keep his job, and perhaps a groundswell of revulsion at unchecked presidential power would follow any action against the special counsel.

closing with:

The president is not a king but a citizen…

and then, once again, directs the reader’s attention to precisely who must be held accountable, should the unthinkable happen:

…how Republican lawmakers respond will shape the future not only of this presidency and of one of the country’s great political parties, but of the American experiment itself.

Resist. Persist. Prevail.

On the Face[book] of it…

An article in the Guardian (looming paywall) described Facebook’s business model as “surveillance capitalism”, a deliciously-succinct moniker, don’t you think?

Disclaimer: I’m no fan of social media. …if you’re one of those poor souls reflexively scrolling through countless feeds chock full of digital drivel all day long, stop reading now, because I can’t do anything for you – you’re hopelessly hooked – please seek professional help.

…to everyone else, please proceed! ;-)

The New Yorker (paywall) just published an opinion piece titled “Mark Zuckerberg’s Apology Tour”, touching on similar themes to the Guardian article; however I was particularly intrigued by the writer’s point regarding those Jekyll and Hyde-style claims emanating from Menlo Park for years…

Since its inception, Facebook has delivered two contradictory sales pitches. To the public, it insisted that it is not an editor or a gatekeeper but merely an open platform…Meanwhile, Facebook’s pitch to advertisers – any advertiser can deliver any message to any microsegment of the market.”

Agreed. Braying about how impartial or neutral your so-called “platform” is, and then pimping detailed demographic data harvested from your so-called “platform” is simply absurd. …and creepy. Definitely creepy.

Ms. Sandberg’s and Mr. Zuckerberg’s apparent fondness for compartmentalization strains credulity – I haven’t seen this level of mental masturbation, er, ummm, uh, I meant mental contortion, (…yeah, that’s it…), since the Clinton/Lewinsky dalliance!

Meanwhile, the Washington Post (paywall) portends a very public flogging when the Chief-Executive-Apologizer™ prostrates himself before Congress, and while most of what will pass for Zuckerberg’s obligatory testimony will be, in fact, little more than banal political theater, we might – emphasis on might – catch a glimpse of honest-to-goodness contrition. Heck, that’s almost an oxymoron – a contrite billionaire. :-)

“We can no longer go with the mantra ‘trust us’ because they have proven untrustworthy,” Blumenthal said about Facebook.

…don’t forget to #deletefacebook!